Difference between revisions of "Cache rating"
From OpenCaching NA
Jump to navigationJump to search (Matching the rating levels with those on the "New Log Entry" page) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The | + | The rating selection is made at the time of posting a '''Log Entry''' at cache's listing on http://www.opencaching.us. |
| − | + | ||
| + | == Scale == | ||
| + | The finder of a cache can rate its quality on a scale from 1 to 5 using the following one of the following adjectives: | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
<li>Poor | <li>Poor | ||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | == Tips == | |
| + | <ul> | ||
| + | <li>Only caches rated at least three times have their average ratings presented in their description pages as well as in the map of the caches. Individual ratings received by a cache are never shown.</li> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <li>While the rating system is primarily intended to assist the geocachers in selecting the caches to hunt, hopefully in the long term it will also positively influence the average quality of the caches listed here.</li> | ||
| − | It has to be stressed that for those caches rated only a few times, the presented average rating should be approached with caution. It is believed that the published average ratings will become more meaningful only for ten or more evaluations of a geocache. Therefore, it is expected that the assessment system will reach its expected functionality only after | + | <li>It has to be stressed that for those caches rated only a few times, the presented average rating should be approached with caution. It is believed that the published average ratings will become more meaningful only for ten or more evaluations of a geocache. Therefore, it is expected that the assessment system will reach its expected functionality only after about year of its introduction, and for some caches even later.</li> |
| − | Until then, we encourage you to responsibly evaluate the caches you find. Remember that the single value is used to assess all the different aspects of the cache quality. Please try to evaluate the caches objectively and always remember that we assess specific caches, and never their owners. | + | <li>Until then, we encourage you to responsibly evaluate the caches you find. Remember that the single value is used to assess all the different aspects of the cache quality. Please try to evaluate the caches objectively and always remember that we assess specific caches, and never their owners.</li> |
Revision as of 00:45, 26 August 2010
The rating selection is made at the time of posting a Log Entry at cache's listing on http://www.opencaching.us.
Scale
The finder of a cache can rate its quality on a scale from 1 to 5 using the following one of the following adjectives:
- Poor
- Mediocre
- Average
- Good
- Excellent
Tips
- Only caches rated at least three times have their average ratings presented in their description pages as well as in the map of the caches. Individual ratings received by a cache are never shown.
- While the rating system is primarily intended to assist the geocachers in selecting the caches to hunt, hopefully in the long term it will also positively influence the average quality of the caches listed here.
- It has to be stressed that for those caches rated only a few times, the presented average rating should be approached with caution. It is believed that the published average ratings will become more meaningful only for ten or more evaluations of a geocache. Therefore, it is expected that the assessment system will reach its expected functionality only after about year of its introduction, and for some caches even later.
- Until then, we encourage you to responsibly evaluate the caches you find. Remember that the single value is used to assess all the different aspects of the cache quality. Please try to evaluate the caches objectively and always remember that we assess specific caches, and never their owners.
